تبیین عوامل موثر بر تولید علمی (مورد مطالعه: دانشگاه مازندران)

نوع مقاله: فناوری اطلاعات( مدیریت دانش -سیستم اطلاعاتی -برون سپاری)

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه مازندران

2 دانشجوی دکتری سیاستگذاری علم و فناوری دانشگاه مازندران

چکیده

حقیقت این است که تولید علم و توسعه علمی به عنوان موتور محرکه در توسعه همه جانبه و پایدار کشورها، نقش عمده­ای ایفا می­کند. یکی از عناصر اصلی و زیر بنایی در تولید علمی و در نظام نهادی و سازمانی علم مفهوم اجتماع علمی و وجود روابط و تعاملات فکری و تخصصی در بین اعضای آن است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی و شناخت دقیق و علمی عوامل موثر بر تولید علمی اعضای اجتماعات علمی دانشگاه مازندران صورت گرفته است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش را، کلیه اعضای هیئت علمی، دانشجویان دکترا و دانشجویان سال دوم کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه مازندران که در سال تحصیلی 94 مشغول به تحصیل می­باشند و تعدادشان برابر 1210 نفر است، تشکیل داده­اند و از میان آنها 292 نفر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. یکی از مهمترین نتایج این پژوهش مشخص شد در میان گروه­های تحصیلی، گروه شیمی بالاترین میانگین تولید علمی و گروه علوم انسانی و اجتماعی پایین­ترین میانگین تولید علمی را به خود اختصاص داده­اند. دوم متغیرهای «تعاملات و ارتباطات»، «فضای گفتگو» و «فضای توجه نمادین» نیز یک رابطه مثبت و معنادار با تولید علمی نشان می­دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Study of the Factors Influencing the scientific production (A Case Study of Mazandaran University, Iran)

نویسندگان [English]

  • nader razeghi 1
  • maryam ghaedi 2
چکیده [English]

abstract: The truth is that science and scientific development as the engine of sustainable comprehensive development and plays a major role. One of the key elements underlying the scientific production and the institutional system of the scientific community and the intellectual and professional relationships and interactions between its members. The concept of the scientific community, deep social relationships, trust, identity, values, everyday actions, solidarity and integrity of the band in higher education institutions and their role in scientific production is evaluated.
This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting the production and recognition of Mazandaran University's academic community members. The research method in this study is survey and quota sampling method is used. The population, all faculty members, doctoral students and second year graduate students at Mazandaran University in the academic year at a school that is 94 times the number of 1210 people And of those, 292 subjects were selected. The results of this research are: (1) education groups, Department of Chemistry highest average production of scientific and humanities and social science to have the lowest production, (2)The variables of "interactions", "space for dialogue" and "respect symbolic space" is also a significant positive correlation with scientific production show.
key

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • "Scientific Community"
  • "Scientific Production"
  • "Scientific Interaction and Communication"
  • "Symbolic Attention Space"

منابع :

-   Abdollahi, M., (1996). Sociology in Iran: looking at the past, present and future. Journal of RAHYAFT. No.13; (in Persian)

-   Azad Armaki, T. (2008). Sociological society in Iran. Tehran: Nashre Kalameh Institute (in Persian).

-   Borokbal, A. (2000), Evolution Of The University As An Institution. Translation by Fazel Larijani. Journal of Approach, No. 23(in Persian).

-   Collins, J. (2000). The sociology of philosophies. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

-   Collins, R. (2004). Interaction chain rituals. Princeton NJ

-   Davari, A., Rezazadeh, A. (2013). "Structural Equation Modeling by Software PLS ", published by Jahad Daneshgahi (SID), First Edition (in Persian).

-   Ebrahimi, Gh. A. and Behnoei Gadaneh, A. (2012). Sociological examination of challenges of scientific communities in Mazandaran University. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 1(18), 1-24 (in Persian).

-   Ghaneie Rad, M. A (2006). (a), Interaction and Communication in the Scientific Community, case study: social sciences field. Tehran: Institute of Social and Cultural Studies (in Persian).

-   Ghaneie Rad, M. A (2006). (b), Interactions of Students and Professors Involved in the Development of Social Capital. Iranian Journal of Sociology. Vol.7, No.1, pp. 3-29 (in Persian).

-   Ghaneie Rad, M. A (2006). (d), Students engagement, disciplinary activism and motivation. Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 2(12), No. 40 (in Persian).

-   Ghaneie Rad, M. A. (2006). (c), The Scientific Community state in the Social Sciences field. Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 27, pp. 27-55 (in Persian).

-          Ghaneie Rad, M. A. and Khosroukhavar, F. (2012). The mentality of the leading researchers in basic sciences about Iran’s scientific community. Journal of Iran’s higher education association, Vol 3, No.4, pp. 7-34 (in Persian).

-   Ghazi tabatabaei, M. and Marjaei, S. H. (2001). The study of factors influencing self-efficiency of MA and PHD students of Tehran University. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, Vol. 4, No.19, PP. 78-110 (in Persian).

-   Ghazipour, F. (2002). Evaluation of normative and organizational factors effective on scientific production of faculty members. Master's Thesis, Tehran University (in Persian).

-   Glaser, J. (2001). ‘Producing communities. In as a theoretical challenge. TASA 2001 Conference, The University of Sydney, Sydney (pp. 1–11).

-   Golinski, J. (1998). Making natural knowledge, Cambridge University Press.

-   Hagstrom, W. Q. (1975). The scientific community, London and Amsterdam: Fefer and Simons, Inc.

-   Jacobs, S. (1987) Scientific community: formulations and critique of a sociological motif, British Journal of Sociology, 38: 266-276.

-   Khastoo, Z. (2010). Study of The Scientific Community As Rites Of Interaction (Case Study: Rites of Interaction Professors of Tehran And Allameh Tabatabaei Universities, Social Science Faculty). Sociology (M.A) thesis, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Department of Social Sciences, University of Guilan (in Persian).

-   Khosro-khavar, F., & M. A. Ghaneirad (2006), “Iran's New Scientific Community”, Iranian Studies, Vol. 39, No. 2.

-   Khosro-khavar, F., M. A. Ghaneirad & A. Toloo (2007), “Institutional Problem of the Emerging Scientific Community in Iran”, Science, Technology and Society, 12: 2 (2007): pp. 171200.

-   Kuhn, T. (1990). Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Translated by Ahmad Azad. Tehran: Soroush Publication (in Persian).

-   Latour, B. and Woolgra, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the constraction of scientific facts, Princenton: Princenton University Press.

-   Mulkay, M.J. (2010). Science and the sociology of knowledge. Translated by Kachouian, H., Tehran: Nashre Nay (in Persian).

-   Navah, A., Rezadoost, K., Pourtrkaruni, M. (2011). Study of affecting factors on student interaction with teachers. Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, (63), 35-41 (in Persian).

-   Rabani Khorasgani, A., Ghasemi, A., Rabani, V., Adibii Sade., M., Ofoghi, N. (2011). Sociological analysis methods for the production of knowledge, reflection in new approaches. Quarterly Journal of Cultural Research. 7(1) PP: 158-117 (in Persian).

-   Rafipoor, F. (2004). Iran's scientific growth barriers and its solutions. Second Edition, Tehran: Sherkate Sahami Enteshar (in Persian).

-   Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and power: toward a political philosophy of science, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

-   Salehi, S. and Ebrahimi, Gh.A. (1999). The Study of factors affecting of the research activities of faculty members (Case study: University of Mazandaran). Journal of Social Sciences, N0.14, PP. 107-138 (in Persian).

-   Sattar, A. (1999). Evaluation of the situation of research among faculty members (Case study: Faculty of educational sciences). Tehran, Education Institute, Quarterly Journal of Education, No. 55 & 56, 95-112 (in Persian).

-   Schofer, E., Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (2000). The effects of science on national economic development, 1970 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 866–887.

-          Soo, Christine W. , Devinney, Timothy M. and Midgley, David F.(2012). " The Process of Knowledge Creation in Organizations" Centre for Corporate Change Australian Graduate School of Management The University of New South Wales Australia. http://www. ccc. agsm. edu.

-   Taleb, M. (1993). Problems of social studies and research in Iran. Articles Presented at the Seminar of Sociology. Tehran: Samt (in Persian).

-   Talebi, M. (2002). Study of affecting factors on production and publication of scientific articles in valid international Journals. Rahyaft. No.27,184-196 (in Persian).

-   Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: the world of high-energy physicists, Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.

-   Vidadhir, Abo Ali (1998). Review of academic Factors Affecting graduate students to follow the norms and anti-norms of science. MA Thesis, University of Tabriz (in Persian).

-   Zolfi Gol, M. A. (2004). From Promotion Of Science To Wealth Cretion Of Knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Policy Science And Research RAHYAFT, No. 33. PP: 24-16 (in Persian).