تاثیر مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی شرکت بر عملکرد مالی در کسب و کارهای خانوادگی و غیر خانوادگی

نوع مقاله: مدیریت سازمانی(چالشهای کسب وکار -اخلاق و مسولیت اجتماعی -تحول سازمانی - عملکرد سازمانی -ریسک)

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار دانشکده کارآفرینی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه کارآفرینی. دانشگاه پیام نور. ساری. مازندران، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه کسب و کار جدید دانشکده کارآفرینی. دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

4 استاد دانشکده اقتصاد دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقاله حاضر با هدف ارزیابی تاثیر مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی شرکت بر عملکرد کسب­وکارهای خانوادگی و غیرخانوادگی اجرا شد. بر این اساس ضمن مرور ادبیات نظری تحقیق، ابعاد شش­گانه مسولیت­پذیری اجتماعی شرکت شناسایی شدند و در ادامه به بررسی تاثیر هر یک از ابعاد بر عملکرد مالی کسب­وکارهای خانوادگی و غیرخانوادگی پرداخته شد. در این تحقیق از روش توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی به کمک مدل معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. به منظور گردآوری داده­ها از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته 67 سوالی با طیف پنج­گانه لیکرت جهت گردآوری داده ها استفاده شد که ضمن تائید روایی و پایایی ابزار در جامعه 830 نفری صاحبان کسب و کارهای عضو اتاق بازرگانی، صنایع، معادن و کشاورزی استان مازندران با کارت بازرگانی فعال به روش روش نمونه گیری طبقه بندی ساده توزیع شد که نهایتا 385 پرسشنامه تکمیل شد و داده­های دریافتی با نرم افزار PLS تجزیه و تحلیل شدند و یافته­های تحقیق نشان داد شدت اثرگذاری ابعاد مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی بر عملکرد مالی کسب و کارهای خانوادگی برابر با 95. و شرکت­های غیرخانوادگی برابر با 51. بوده است که بیانگر معنی دار بودن اختلاف میزان اثرگذاری دو گروه می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance of Family and Nonfamily Businesses

نویسندگان [English]

  • jahangir Yadolahi farsi 1
  • Aliakbar Aghajani afrouzi 2
  • Mahmod Ahmadpour Dariani 3
  • Mahmoud Motevasseli 4
1 Associate Professor at the University of Tehran Entrepreneurship Faculty, Tehran, Iran
2 PhD student, Entrepreneurship DEpartment, Mazandaran Payam e Noor University, Sari Iran
3 Associate Professor at the University of Tehran Entrepreneurship Faculty, Tehran, Iran
4 Professor, Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The present paper aims to identify the dimensions of components of corporate social responsibility, and provide a comparative comparison of the extent to which each of the dimensions identified in the family business was compared with non-family counterparts. At the same time, reviewing the theoretical literature of the research, the six dimensions of corporate social responsibility were identified with the approval of academic and corporate experts. In the following, the impact of each dimension on financial performance of family and non-family business people of Mazandaran province was investigated. A descriptive survey method using structural equation model was used in this research. In order to collect data, a researcher-made questionnaire of 67 questions with a five-point Likert questionnaire was used to collect data. In addition, verifying the validity and reliability of the instruments with a community of 830 business owners with active trading cards as members of the Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines And agriculture in Mazandaran province, the questionnaires were distributed by simple sampling method. Finally, 385 questionnaires were completed and the data were analyzed using PLS software. The results of the research showed that the impact of social responsibility dimensions on financial performance in Family businesses is 95th and in non-family firms is 51st. This indicates that there is a significant difference in the effectiveness of the two groups.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Financial performance
  • Family business
  • Nonfamily business
  • Ethics

Amoako-Gyampah Kwasi Jayaram Jayanth, (2011).  Resilience in family and nonfamily firms: an examination of the relationships between manufacturing strategy, competitive strategy and firm performance, International journal of production research: American Institute of Industrial Engineers; Society of Manufacturing Engineers. 49 (18) 5527-5545.

Aldrich, Howard E & Cliff, Jennifer E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship:  toward a family embeddedness perspective, Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (5), 573-596.

Alfonso Dau, L. Purkayastha, S. A. & Eddleston, K. (2018). Who does it best? Family and nonfamily owners and leaders navigating institutional development in emerging markets, Journal of Business Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.039.

Arregle, Jean-luc, Miller, Toyah L., Hitt, Michael A., & Beamish, Paul W. (2013). Do Regions Matter? An Integrated Institutional and Semigelobalization Perspective on the Internationalization of men, Strategic Management Journal, Strat. Mgmt. J., 34, 910–934.

Aras, G. & Crowther, D. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility, 1sd edition, bookboon.com.

Arregle, J.-L., M. A. Hitt, D. G. Sirmon & Very, P. (2007). The Development of Organizational Social Capital: Attributes of Family Firms, Journal of Management Studies 44(1), 73-95.

Austin, J., Stevenson, H., &Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.

Barnett, M.L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 794–816.

Bergamaschi, M. & Randerson, K. (2015). The futures of family businesses and the development of corporate social responsibility, Published by Elsevier L td, 1-12.

Baron, D. P., (2000), Business and its environment, 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Berrone, Pascual, Gomez_Mejia,  & Luis R., (2012). Environmental Performance and Executive Compensation: An integration Agency-Institution Perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 52, (1), 103–126.

Bingham, J. B., Dyer, W. G., Jr., Smith, I., & Adams, G. L. (2011). A stakeholder identity orientation approach to corporate social performance in family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 565-585.

Bjuggren, P-O. & Sund, L-G. (2001). Strategic Decision Making in Intergenerational Successions of Small- and Medium-Size Family-Owned Businesses,Family Business Review, 14 (1), 11-23.

Burrell Gibson (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life, Heinemann educational Books Ltd, London.

Campopiano, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and family business: Different perspectives to explore an under investigated topic(Doctoral dissertation). Università degli studi di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.

Callan, Scott J. & Thomas, Janet M. (2011), Executive Compensation, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Financial Performance: A Multi-Equation Framework, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 8, 332–351.

Carr, Jon C. & Hmieleski, Keith M. (2015). Differences in the Outcomes of Work and Family Conflict Between Family- and Nonfamily Businesses: An Examination of Business Founders, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 39(6).

Carroll, Archie.  B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance, Academy of management. 4,  497- 505 .

Cater, J., & Schwab, A. (2008). Turnaround Strategies in Established Small Family Firms. Family Business Review, 21(1), 31–50. 

Certo, S.T. & Miller, T. (2008). Social entrepreneurship: Key issues and concepts. Business Horizons, 51(4), 267–271.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research, Marcoulides, G. A. (ed.),Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1295-1336.

Chirico F. and Salvato C. (2008). Knowledge integration and dynamic organizational adaptation in family firms. Family Business Review, 21 (2), 169-181.

Chua, J. H., J. J. Chrisman & E. B. Bergiel (2009). An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalized family firm.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 355-372.

Davis, K & Blomstrom RL, (1966), Business and its environment, McGraw-Hil.

Dyer, W. G. and Whetten, D. A. (2006), Family Firms and Social Responsibility: Preliminary Evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, pp.785-802.

Felstead, A. and Jewson, N. (2000) In Work, at Home: Towards an Understanding of Homeworking. London: Routledge.

Feliu, Neus & C. Botero, Isabel. (2016). Philanthropy in Family Enterprises: A Review of Literature, Family Business Review. Vol. 29(1), 121–141.

Fombrun, C., Gardberg, N., & Barnett, M. 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105: 85–106.

Fornell, C.; Lacker, D. F. (1981). Evaluation structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error, Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Fletcher, e. Melin, L. Gimeno, A. (2012).Culture and values in family business—A review and suggestions for future research, Journal of Family Business Strategy,Volume 3, Issue 3,Pages 127-131.

Fombrun, C. 2001. Corporate reputations as economic assets. In M. Hitt, R. Freeman, & J. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management: 289–312. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Gersick, K, E.  Feliu, N. (2013), Governing the Family Enterprise: Practices, Performance and Research, Sage Handbook of Family Business.

Goel, S. Mazzola, P. & Phan, P. M. Pieper, Torsten . K. Zachary, Ramona. (2010). Strategy, ownership, governance, and socio-psychological perspectives on family, Journal of  Family Business Strategy, 3 , 54–65 .

Hakim, C., (1987), Trends in the flexible workforce, Employment Gazette, 95. pp. 549-560.

Jess H. Chua and James J. Chrisman and Lloyd P. Steier,(2003). Extending the Theoretical Horizons of Family Business Research, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Volume 27, no. 4, 331-338.

Kammerlander, Nadine & Sieger , Philipp & Voordeckers,  Wim & Zellweger, Thomas . (2015). Value creation in family firms: A model of fit, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6, 63–72.

Lapiņa, Inga, Maurāne, Gunta, & Stariņeca, Olga., (2014),  Human resource management models: aspects of knowledge management and corporate social responsibility, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 110, 577 – 586.

Long, R., & Mathews, K. (2011). Ethics in the Family Firm: Cohesion through Reciprocity and Exchange. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 287-308.

Mason, C., Carter, S., & Tagg, S. (2010). Invisible Businesses: the characteristics of home-based businesses in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies, 45(5), 625-639.

McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988).  Corporate social responsibility and financial firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854-872.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Chrisman, J. J., & Spence, L. J. (2011). Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 235-255.

Miles, P . C. &Miles, G. (2013),"Corporate social responsibility and executive compensation: exploring the link", Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 9 Iss 1 pp. 76 – 90

Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Family and Lone Founder Ownership and Strategic Behaviour: Social Context, Identity and Institutional Logics. Journal of Management Studies 48:1.

Neubauer, F. Lank, AG (2015). The family business: Its governance for sustainability. books.google.com

Neubaum, D. O., Dibrell, C., & Craig, J. B. (2012). Balancing natural environmental concerns of internal and external stakeholders in family and non-family businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(1), 28-37.

Niehm, L. S, Swinney, J., & Miller, N. J. (2008). Community social responsibility and its consequences for family business performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 331-350.

Orlitzky, Marc, Schmidt, Frank L. & Rynes, Sara L., (2003), Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis, Organization Studies, 24 (3).

Panikkos Zata PoutziourisLloyd Steier, & Kosmas X. Smyrnios, (2004). Guest editorial A commentary on family business entrepreneurial developments, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 10 Issue: 1/2, .7-11, 

Parhizgar, M. M. & Aghajani Afrouzi, A. (2012). Advanced Research Methodology in Management with Applied Approach, © Payam e noor university Publishing. 

Pimentel, D. Scholten, M.Couto, J, P.  (2018). Fast or slow? Decision-making styles in small family and nonfamily firms, Journal of Family Business Management, 8(2), 113-125.

Pino, Giovanni, Amatulli, Cesare, Angelis,  Matteo De & Peluso Alessandro M. (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility on consumers' attitudes and intentions toward genetically modified foods: evidence from Italy, Journal of Cleaner Production, (In press).

Porter, M. E. & Karamer, M. R., (2002).The Competitive advantage of corporate Philanthropy, Harvard Business Review, 80 (12), 56.

Porter, m. E and Karamer, M. R., (2006). Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility, harvard business review, 1-15.

Preslmayer, C. Kuttner, M. Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B. (2018) "Uncovering the research field of corporate social responsibility in family firms: a citation analysis", Journal of Family Business Management, 8 (2), 169-195.

Sayekti, yosefa., (2015), Strategic Corporate social Responsibility(CSR), Company financial performance and Earning response Coefficient: Empirical Evidence on Indonesian Listed Companies, Procedia- social and behavioral sciences, 211, 411-420.

Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2003). Succession planning as planned behavior, Some empirical results. Family Business Review, 16, 1-15.

Stanley, J, L. McDowell, W. (2014). The role of interorganizational trust and organizational efficacy in family and nonfamily firms, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5 (3), 264-275.

Stevens,Robin.et al (2014). The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions,Measurement,Validation, and Relation. 1042-2587 © Baylor University.

Vertigans, Stephen & O.idowu, Samuel. (2017).   Corporate Social Responsibility Academic Insights and Impacts, © Springer International publishing Switzerland.