Examining the Effect of Green Technology on Sustainable Performance with the Mediation of Smart Logistics and Moderation of Green Governance in Knowledge-based Companies

Document Type : Production & Operations Management

Authors

1 MSc. Student of Business Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

2 Associate Professor; Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

3 Assistant Professor; Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

10.22080/jem.2024.27324.3937

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the effect of green technology with the mediation of smart logistics and moderation of green governance on the sustainable performance of knowledge-based companies. In terms of purpose, this research is applied, and in terms of information gathering method, it is descriptive.  The study is also a correlation type, and a questionnaire was used to collect data. The statistical population of the current research was all managers of knowledge-based companies in the West and East Azerbaijan provinces, which included 440 companies. Based on Morgan's table, the required sample size of 205 people was obtained by stratified random sampling. For more certainty, 219 questionnaires were distributed. SPSS22, PLS3, and Excel software were used for data analysis. The findings of the research showed that green technology has a positive and significant effect on sustainable performance and smart logistics. In addition, smart logistics significantly impacts the sustainable performance of the company. Moreover, green governance has a positive moderating role in the impact of green technology on smart logistics. Green governance also has a positive moderating role in the impact of smart logistics on the company's sustainable performance. Finally, smart logistics positively mediates the relationship between green technology and sustainable company performance. From this study, it can be concluded that applying green technologies can help knowledge-based companies understand the potential of digital platforms to support innovation and sustainable performance. However, to achieve a higher sustainable performance, knowledge-based companies should adopt a smart logistics approach, which will not only reduce the negative impact on the climate but also benefit economic growth and society.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bachár, M., & Makyšová, H. (2019). Evaluation of the impact of intelligent logistics elements on the efficiency of functioning internal logistics processes. Acta Tecnología, 5(3), 55-58.‏
Bashirkhodaparasti, R., & Bagheri Garbollagh, H. (2023). Exploring the role of urban entrepreneurship, digital technologies and smart logistics on sustainable business in the smart city: the moderating role of market turbulence. Journal of International Business Administration, 6(2), 155-175. [in persian].
Chang, D. L., Sabatini-Marques, J., Da Costa, E. M., Selig, P. M., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2018). Knowledge-based, smart and sustainable cities: A provocation for a conceptual framework. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(1), 1-17.‏
Chang, H. Y., Wang, C. Y., Lee, M. H., Wu, H. K., Liang, J. C., Lee, S. W. Y., ... & Tsai, C. C. (2015). A review of features of technology-supported learning environments based on participants’ perceptions. Computers in human behavior, 53, 223-237.‏
Deng, Y., You, D., & Wang, J. (2022). Research on the nonlinear mechanism underlying the effect of tax competition on green technology innovation-An analysis based on the dynamic spatial Durbin model and the threshold panel model. Resources Policy, 76, 102545.‏
Denk, A. (2021). Exclusive public—an analysis of public participation in the site selection procedure for a repository for nuclear waste. Frontiers in Political Science, 6, 1271062.‏
Fernando, Y., Rozuar, N. H. M., & Mergeresa, F. (2021). The blockchain-enabled technology and carbon performance: Insights from early adopters. Technology in Society, 64, 101507.‏
Fouji, M. M. H. (2019). Investigating waste recycling intentions of top management in Bangladesh's leather industry: A hybrid analytical framework. Cleaner Waste Systems, 8, 100140.‏
GISTI (Paris). 2017. “En Méditerranée, bâillonner pour mieux tuer.” Plein droit. Migration, Borders and Citizenship: Between Policy and Public Spheres, 89-107
Guo, M., Nowakowska-Grunt, J., Gorbanyov, V., & Egorova, M. (2020). Green technology and sustainable development: Assessment and green growth frameworks. Sustainability, 12(16), 6571.‏
Haji Pour, E., & Aeiny, M. A. (2021). Institutional Pressure and Sustainable Performance of Industrial Manufacturing Companies: Analyzing the Mediating Role of Strategic Learning (Case study; Kermanshah Industrial Town). Journal of Executive Management, 13(25), 165-188. [in persian].
Hernandez, R. R., Jordaan, S. M., Kaldunski, B., & Kumar, N. (2020). Aligning climate change and sustainable development goals with an innovation systems roadmap for renewable power. Frontiers in Sustainability, 1, 583090.‏
Jan, P., Nemecek, T., Dux, D., & Doluschitz, R. (2018). Factors affecting global versus local environmental and economic performance of dairying: A case study of Swiss mountain farms. Sustainability, 10(8), 2940.‏
Katz‐Gerro, T., & López Sintas, J. (2019). Mapping circular economy activities in the European Union: Patterns of implementation and their correlates in small and medium‐sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 485-496.‏
Karaman, A. S., Kilic, M., & Uyar, A. (2018). Sustainability reporting in the aviation industry: worldwide evidence. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 9(4), 362-391.‏
Khan, S. A. R., Jian, C., Zhang, Y., Golpîra, H., Kumar, A., & Sharif, A. (2019). Environmental, social and economic growth indicators spur logistics performance: from the perspective of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation countries. Journal of cleaner production, 214, 1011-1023.‏
Khan, S. A. R., Zhang, Y., Anees, M., Golpîra, H., Lahmar, A., & Qianli, D. (2018). Green supply chain management, economic growth and environment: A GMM based evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 588-599.‏
Lin, R., Gui, Y., Xie, Z., & Liu, L. (2019). Green governance and international business strategies of emerging economies’ multinational enterprises: A multiple-case study of Chinese firms in pollution-intensive industries. Sustainability, 11(4), 1013.‏
Roozbeh, Z., madaheyan, S., & nikpour, A. (2023). Presenting a green governance model with a sustainable development approach in the health system (case study: Kerman University of Medical Sciences). Management and Educational Perspective, 5(3), 70-99. [in persian].
Shei, R. J., Sinai, E. C., Paris, H. L., Keller, A. M., & Mickleborough, T. D. (2021). The influence of carbohydrate ingestion on peripheral and central fatigue during exercise in hypoxia: A narrative review. European journal of sport science, 21(10), 1423-1435.
Tang, C. F., & Abosedra, S. (2019). Logistics performance, exports, and growth: Evidence from Asian economies. Research in Transportation Economics, 78, 100743.‏
Xu, S., & Zhu, H. (2022). Does green governance efficiency and green finance polices matters in sustainable environment: Implications for public health. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 861349.‏
Yikun, Z., Leong, L. W., Abu-Rumman, A., Shraah, A. A., & Hishan, S. S. (2023). Green growth, governance, and green technology innovation. How effective towards SDGs in G7 countries?. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(2).‏