بررسی عوامل موثر بر پذیرش یادگیری سیار مورد مطالعه: دانشجویان رشته‌های مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران و فردوسی مشهد

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیئت علمی دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران

2 دانشجوی مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

محبوبیت دستگاه‌های سیار در سال‌های اخیر موجب شده است که صنعت آموزش به دنبال یافتن راهی برای استفاده از آنها به عنوان ابزاری آموزشی برای حصول یادگیری فردی در هر زمان و مکان باشد. از آنجا که شناخت عوامل تاثیر‌گذار بر پذیرش هر فناوری جدید گام اول در پیاده‌سازی آن است، هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر تعیین میزان اثر این عوامل بر پذیرش یادگیری سیار بود. در این راستا، نظریه رفتار برنامه ریزی‌شده مبنای نظری این پژوهش قرار گرفت و 318 نفر از دانشجویان رشته مدیریت دو دانشگاه بزرگ کشور نمونه آماری را تشکیل داد. برای برازش مدل و تحلیل داده‌ها در قالب مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری از نرم‌افزار لیزرل استفاده گردید. نتایج آزمون نشان داد که اثر سه متغیر اصلی نظریه رفتار برنامه‌ریزی شده بر قصد رفتاری، مورد تأیید است و اثر سهولت استفاده درک شده و سودمندی درک شده بر نگرش رد شد. همچنین، اثر استقلال یادگیری بر کنترل رفتاری درک شده تأیید نشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

An investigating into the factors affecting mobile learning adoption Case study: Management students of Tehran University and Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

چکیده [English]

In recent years mobile devices popularity has led the education industry to look for ways to use them as learning tools for users to achieve self-learning anytime and anywhere. Since understanding the factors affecting the adoption of any new technology is the first step in its implementation, the main objective of this study is to identify factors affecting the mobile learning adoption. Hence, the theory of planned behavior was used as theoretical foundation in order to achieve this goal. The study population consisted of 318 management students of two major universities in Iran. In order to test the hypotheses proposed by the research model, structural equation model was used by Lisrel software. The results showed that the three main variables of the theory of planned behavior have direct and significant relationship with behavioral intention. The relationship between perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness with attitude and the relationship between learning autonomy and perceived behavioral control were not confirmed.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mobile learning
  • Technology adoption
  • Theory of Planned Behavior
  • management students
-Abas, Z. W., Peng, C. L., &Mansor, N. (2009). A Study on learning readiness for mobile learning at open university malaysia. IADIS International Comference Mobile learning 2009, (51-57).

-Ahmadi, M., Shiri Ahmad Abadi, M. E., &Askari Moghadam, R. (2012). Evaluating Effective Factors on Successful Implementation of M-learning in Iranian Universities by Using TRA Model. Journal of Technology of Education, 6(3), 185-194. (In Persian).

-Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 179-211.

-Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., &Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers&Education , 1054-1064.

-El-Hussein, N. O., &Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher educatoin landscape. Educational Technology&Society , 12-21.

-Hamat, A., Embi, M. A., &Abu Hassan, H. (2012). Mobile Learning Readiness Among UKM Lecturers. Social and Behavoral Sciences , 406-410.

-Huang, J.-H., Lin, Y.-R., &Chuang, S.-T. (2007). Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning A perspective of the extended technology acceptance model. The electronic library , 585-598.

-Iqbal, S., &Qureshi, I. A. (2012). M-learning adoption: A perspective from a developing country. The international Review of research in open and distance learning , 147-164.

-Jairak, K., Praneetpolgrang, P., &Mekhabunchakij, K. (2009). An acceptance of mobile learning for higher education students in -Thailand. The sixth International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, (361-368). Thailand.

-Jia Qi, C., Theng, C. C., Yeoh Chooi Yee, S., Sxe Yin, T., &Suen Chee, Y. (2012). Determinants affecting acceptance level of mobile learning among public university students.Universiti tunku abdul rahman.

-Kadirire, J. (2009). Mobile learning DeMystified. R. Guy, The evolution of mobile teaching and learning.California: Informing Science Press.

-Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K., &Chang, R. (2008). Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students' use of technology. Ascilite, (484-492). Melbourne.

-Khazai, S., Vahid dastjerdi, H., &Talebi Nejhad, M. R. (2011). The role of mobile communications technology in teaching and learning English vocabulary. Journal of Technology of Education, 6(2), 135-142 (In Persian).

-Khotanlo, H., &Batmanghelichi, E. (2013). Presenting a Framework for Acceptance of Mobile Learning (Case study: Applicants of Entrance Exam of University). Journal of Technology of Education, 7(3), 221-228 (In Persian).

-Korucu, A. T., &Alkan, A. (2011). Differences between m-learning(mobile-learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in education. Procedia Social And Behavioral Science , 1925-1930.

-Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning. The journal of EUROCALL , 157-165.

-Liew, B. T., Kang, M., Yoo, E., &You, J. (2013). Investigating the determinants of mobile learning acceptance in Korea. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications(1424-1430). Victoria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

-Liu, Y. (2008). An adoption model for mobile learning. Finland.

-Liu, Y., Han, S., &Li, H. (2010). Understanding the factors driving m-learning adoption: a literature review. Campus-Wide Information System , 210-226.

-Mahat, J., Ayub, A. F., &Luan, S. (2012). an Assessment of Students' Mobile Self-Efficacy, Readiness and Personal Innovativeness towards Mobile learning in Higher Education in Malaysia. Social and Behavioral Sciences , 284-290.

-Moon, J.-W., &Kim, Y.-G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information&Management , 217-230.

Nassuora, A. B. (2012). Students acceptance of mobile learning for higher education. American Academic&Scholarly Research Journal , 1-6.

-Raminmehr, H., &Charsetad, P. (2013). Quantitative Research Method using Structural Equation Modeling (Lisrel Software).Tehran: Termeh Publication, (In Persian).

-Ting, R. Y.-L. (2005). Mobile learning: current trend and future challenges. Fifth IEEE International Conference, (603-607).

-Trinder, J. J. (2012). Mobile learning evaluation: the development of tools and techniques for the evaluation of learning exploiting mobile devices through the analysis of automatically collected usage logs-an iterative approach. PhD Thesis . Glasgow, Scotland: University of glasgow.

-Uzunboylu, H., Bicen, H., &Cavus, N. (2011). The eficient virtual learning environment: A case study of web 2.0 tools and windows live spaces. Computers&Education , 720-726.

-Wang, Y.-S., Wu, M.-C., &Wang, H.-Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology , 92-118.

-Wei-Han Tan, G., Ooi, K.-B., Sim, J.-J., &Phusavat, K. (2012). Determinants of mobile learning adoption: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Computer Information Systems , 82-91.

-West, T., &Schofield, C. P. (2012). The opportunities of mobile learning for executive education. The Ashridge Journal , 1-7.

Zamani, B. E., Babri, H., &Ghorbani, S. (2013). Strategies for the Development of Mobile Learning through Teaching-Learning Activities in Medical Education: Perspectives of Medical Students and IT Professionals in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 13(2), 87-97 (In Persian).

-Zhuang, S., Hu, L., Xu, H., &Tian, Y. (2011). M-Learning Desing Based on Personal Knowledge Management. Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII), (135-138). China.