تأثیر سرمایه فکری بر عملکرد سازمانی؛ نقش میانجی‌گری چابکی سازمانی و مزیت رقابتی

نوع مقاله : مدیریت و سازمان(اخلاق و مسئولیت اجتماعی، رهبری و تحول سازمانی، عملکرد سازمانی، ریسک، مدیریت منابع سازمانی، سطوح تحلیل سازمانی، بلوغ سازمانی، آسیب­‌شناسی سازمانی، نظام اداری، . . . )

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه مدیریت ؛ دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان ؛ ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت؛ دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان؛ ایران

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه مدیریت دانشگاه اصفهان؛ ایران

چکیده

امروزه، دارایی‌های دانش‌محور همچون سرمایه فکری به راهبرد کلیدی جهت دستیابی به موفقیت و بقای سازمانی در محیط رقابتی و غیرقابل پیش‌بینی تبدیل شده است. هدف این پژوهش بررسی تأثیر سرمایه فکری و عملکرد سازمانی با میانجی‌گری چابک‌سازی سازمانی و مزیت رقابتی در یکی از نیروگاه‌های کشور است. روش پژوهش ازنظر هدف کاربردی و از لحاظ گردآوری داده‌ها از نوع توصیفی-پیمایشی و از نوع علّی است. بدین منظور نمونه‌ای به حجم 230 آزمودنی، از بین کارکنان نیروگاه برق با روش نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای متناسب با حجم انتخاب شدند. جهت جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه‌ی محقق ساخته‌ و برای بررسی روایی پرسشنامه از روایی محتوایی و سازه و برای تعیین پایایی پرسشنامه از روش آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شده است. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها و آزمون فرضیه‌ها با استفاده از الگوسازی معادلات ساختاری از نرم‌افزارهای SPSS 21 و Amos 22 استفاده گردید. نتایج حاصل از بررسی فرضیه‌های پژوهش نشان داد که سرمایه فکری به صورت مستقیم بر عملکرد سازمانی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. همچنین مزیت رقابتی و چابکی سازمانی نقش میانجی در رابطه میان سرمایه فکری و عملکرد سازمانی داشته‌اند، در نهایت الگوی کلی پژوهش تأیید شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Intellectual Capital on Organizational Performance:The mediation Role of Organizational Agility and Competitive Advantage

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Safari 1
  • Mohammad Housain Moshref Javadi 2
  • Marziyeh Mirzaiefar 3
1 University of Isfahan
2 University of Isfahan
3 University of Isfahan
چکیده [English]

Today, knowledge-based assets such as intellectual capital as a key strategy to achieve success and survival in the competitive environment and has become unpredictable. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of intellectual capital on organizational performance through organizational agility and competitive advantage in one of the country's power plants. In terms of goal the research was causal and in terms of collecting data it was descriptive-respectively. The participants of this study were 230 employees of power plant that were selected stratified sampling method as the sample of this study. A questionnaire was used to collect data and to check the validity of Content and construct validity and Cronbach's alpha was used to determine reliability. To analyze data and test hypotheses was based on structural equation modeling (SEM) and with SPSS 21 and Amos 22 software. The results showed that intellectual capital is a positive and significant impact on organizational performance directly. Competitive advantage and organizational agility as well as the role of mediator in the relationship between intellectual capital and organizational performance, finally the general pattern research approved. Therefore, Organizations that want to develop their competitive advantage and organizational agility, should invest on effective implementation of Intellectual capital.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Intellectual Capital
  • Organizational Performance
  • Organizational Agility
  • Competitive advantage
  • Power Plant

مراجع

Akbari, M.; Poor, S., & Ayati, M. (2014). Explanation of organizational performance based on the trend of entrepreneurship and intellectual capital: Structural Equation Model, Productivity management, 30(8), 115-133.
Allameh, M., & Abumasoudi, A. (2015). The Effect of intellectual capital, with the mediating role of knowledge management and cultural capital on organizational performance from the perspective of the BSC (Case Study: Isfahan Gas Company), Management Accounting, 8(24),73-87.
Allameh, S. M.; Samavatiyan, H., & Shojaie, M. (2011). Studying the Impact of Organizational Agility Dimensions on Organizational Performance in Isfahan Gas Co, M.A. Thesis, Faculty of Administrative Sciences & Economics, University of Isfahan.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management Decision, 36(2), 63-76.
Cabrita, M. R., & Bontis, N. (2008). Intellectual capital and Business Performance in the Portuguese Banking Industry, International Journal of Technology Management, 43(1-3), 212-237.
Carson, E.; Ranzijn, R.; Winefield, A., & Marsden, H. (2004). Intellectual capital: Mapping employee and work group attributes, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(3), 443-463.
Chen, J.; Zhu, Z., & Xie, H.Y. (2004). Measuring intellectual capital: a new model and empirical study, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 195-212.
Dzenopoljac, V.; Janosevic, S., & Bontis, N. (2016). Intellectual capital and financial performance in the Serbian ICT industry, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 373-396.
-Ghafuri, P.; Farhadi, A., & Mansouri, A. (2014). Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Organizational Agility with Mediatory Role of Employee Empowering in Service Sector (Case Study: Karafarin Insurance Company), International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 3(12), 11-15.
Ghlich Lee, B., & Moshabaki, A. (2007). The Role of social capital in developing intellectual capital of the organization (Two Iranian automotive company),Quarterly Management Knowledge,19,125-147.
Gopal Maji, S., & Goswami, M. (2017). Intellectual capital and firm performance in India: a comparative study between original and modified value added intellectual coefficient model, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 14(1), 76–89.
Haji Karim, A. A., & Parhizgar, M. M. (2008). Mechanisms of modern systems design and implementation, performance evaluation in commercial banks of the country (Case Study; Bank Mellat), Journal of Executive Management, 7(27), 13-42.
Hasnavi, R., & Ramazan, M. (2011). Intellectual capital increase within the organization: the role of organizational learning, Improve Management, 5(1), 25-39.
Hooman, H. A.  (2005). Structural Equation Modeling with Using Laser Software, Tehran: Samt Publication.
Hormiga, E.; Batista-Canino, R. M., & Sánchez-Medina, A. (2011). The role of intellectual capital in the success of new ventures, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1),71-92.‏
Hsu, Y. H., & Wang, C. H. (2012). Clarifying the Effect of Intellectual Capital on Performance: The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capability, British Journal of Management, 23(2), 179-205.
Inkinen, H. (2015). Review of empirical research on intellectual capital and firm performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(3), 518-565.
Janosevic, S.; Dzenopoljac, V., & Bontis, N. (2013). ). Intellectual Capital and Financial Performance in Serbia, Knowledge and Process management, 20(1), 1-11.
Kamukama, N.; Ahiauzu, A. & Ntayi, J. M. (2011). Competitive advantage: mediator of intellectual capital and performance, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(1), 152-164.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2005). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance‏, Harvard business review, July-August.
Khosh Sima, G. (2006). Canonical Correlation Analysis of Agility and Strategic Performance of Manufacturing Organizations, Studies Quarterly Industrial Management, 3(11), 115-143.
Li, S.; Ragu-Nathan, B.; Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Rao, S. S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance, Omega, 34(2), 107-124.
McGill, T. P. (2006). Harnessing intellectual capital: A study of organizational knowledge transfer, ProQuest.‏
Morgana, R. E., & Strong, C. A. (2003). Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation, Journal of Business Research, 56(3), 163-176.
OOpens overlay Ali Şahin Örnek, Opens overlay Siyret AyasOOخخrnek, A. S., & Ayas, S. (2015). The Relationship Betwen Intellectual Capital, Innovative Work Behavior and Business Performance Reflection, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1387-1395.
Papalexandris, A.; Ioannou, G.; Prastacos, G., & Soderquist, K.E. (2005). An Integrated Methodology for Putting the Balanced Scorecard into Action,European Management Journal,23(2), 214-227.
Sepahvand, R.; Aref Nejad, M., & Shariat Nejad, A. (2015). The Survey of Information Technology Effect on Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management Strategies with Moderator Effect of Organizational Agility, Management Organizational Resources Researches, 5(3), 71-96.
Setia, P.; Sambamurthy, V., & Closs, D. J. (2008). Realizing business value of agile IT applications: antecedents in the supply chain networks, Information Technology and Management, 9(1), 5-19.‏
Swink, M., & Song, M. (2007). Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration on new product development time and competitive advantage, Journal ofOperations Management, 25(1), 203-217.
Tikkamaki, K., & Mavengere, N. (2013). Organizational Learning, Agility and Social Technologies in Contemporary Workplaces, IFIP WG 3.4 International Conference, Tallinn, Estonia.
Vahdati, H.; Nejad, S. H. M., & Abulfazl, S. (2014). The Achievement of organizational Agility through the Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Intellectual Capital, Indian Journal of Scientific Research, 4(3), 51-58.‏
Worley, C. G., & Lawler, E. E. (2010). Agility and Organization Design: A Diagnostic Framework, Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 194-204.
Youssefi, F., & Shams al-Din, E. (2015). The Relationship between intellectual capital, competitive advantage and improve financial performance between representatives of Iran Khodro city Nurabad mamasani, National Ocean Conference Management, Shiraz: Iran's modern education development center (Mtana).

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 07 اسفند 1395
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 05 آبان 1396
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 09 شهریور 1396

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار