رتبه‌بندی معیارهای تاثیرگذار بر نظام نوآوری بخشی در خودرو سبک ایران خودرو: ترکیب روش دیمتل و بهترین-بدترین

نوع مقاله : نوآوری(سیاست‌های نوآوری، ظرفیت نوآوری، اکوسیستم نوآوری، نظام نوآوری، تحقیق و توسعه، . . . .)

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مرکز تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه پیام نور

2 استاد، هیات علمی دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران

3 استادیار دانشگاه پیام نور اصفهان

چکیده

امروزه نوآوری برای سازمان‌هایی که می‌خواهند تداوم حیات داشته باشند برای ادامه عمر اهمیّت زیادی دارد. سازمان‌های فاقد ابتکار و خلاقیّت در دنیای پیشرفته امروز عملاً حرفی برای گفتن ندارند. بنابراین در حال حاضر باید برای اداره سازمان‌ها به نوآوری و بهره گیری از دستاورد های علمی و فنّی همّت گماشت و راه را برای نوآوری و ارائه طرح های مناسب در این سازمان‌ها هموار نمود. در این پژوهش در گام اول با استفاده از مطالعات پیشین و نظر خبرگان به شناسایی معیارهای توسعه نوآوری و فناوری در صنعت خودروسازی اقدام ‌شد. در گام دوم از روش دیمتل ارتباطات درونی هریک از معیارها و زیرمعیارهای شناسایی شده، مورد بررسی قرار خواهد گرفت. نتایج بدست آمده از روش دیمتل در گام بعدی مورد استفاده قرار خواهد گرفت. لذا در مرحله سوم با استفاده از روش‌های تصمیم‌گیری بهترین-بدترین، وزن و رتبه هریک از معیارهای نهایی شده بدست خواهند آمد. یافته‌های این پژوهش نشان میدهد که مهمترین مولفه‌های موثر در توسعه نوآوری در بخش صنعت خودروی سبک و با توجه به رتبه بندی عوامل و چالش‌های تعیین شده براساس سند توسعه راهبردی به توسعه نوآوری و فناوری در سیاست‌های کلان کشور توجه بسیار گردد اما درصنعت مورد بحث به منابع توسعه نوآوری آنچنانکه بایستی از سوی عوامل تاثیرگذار بالادستی به عنوان سیاست گذاران و سرمایه گذاران حمایت صورت نگرفته است. بنابراین عمده عوامل تاثیر گذار توسعه یعنی منابع نوآوری و فعالیت های فناورانه و تامین کنندگان نهادهای بخشی به عنوان عوامل موثر بر توسعه نوآوری نتوانسته اند نقشه اساسی خود را ایفا کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Ranking of Criteria Affecting the Innovation System in Automotive Industry: Combination of the DEMETAL and Best-Worst Method

نویسندگان [English]

  • Aliakbar Mazloumi Aboukheili 1
  • Alireza Aliahmadi 2
  • Gholamreza Esmailian 3
1 Phd. Student of Payame Noor University
2 Professor, Iran University of Science and Technology
3 Assistant Professor, Payame Noor University
چکیده [English]

Innovation is very important today for organizations that want to survive and stay alive. In today's advanced world, organizations that lack initiative and creativity have little to say in practice. Therefore, at present, to manage organizations, it is necessary to innovate and take advantage of scientific and technical achievements and pave the way for innovation and presenting appropriate plans in these organizations. In the first step, using previous studies and the opinion of experts, the criteria for the development of innovation and technology in the automotive industry are identified. second step, using the Demetel method, the internal relationships of each of the identified criteria and sub-criteria will be examined. The results obtained from the Demetel method will be used in the next step.Therefore, in the third stage, using the best-worst decision-making methods, the weight and rank of each of the finalized criteria will be obtained.The findings of this study showed that the most important components in the development of innovation in the light vehicle industry and according to the ranking of factors and challenges determined based on the strategic development Has been document of the industry to the development of innovation and technology in macro policies. But in the industry in question, the resources for innovation development have not been adequately supported by upstream influencers as policymakers and investors. Therefore, the main factors influencing development, namely sources of innovation and technological activities, and suppliers of sectoral institutions as factors affecting the development of innovation have not been able to play their basic plan.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • "Ranking"
  • "DEMATEL"
  • Best Worst Method
  • Automotive Industry
  • Sectoral Innovation System
Ajdari, Ali Asghar and Shojaei, Saeed.(1394). Analysis of the IRANs automobile industry and providing solutions to overcome the existing challenges in line with the general policies of the resistance economy. Available on the website of the Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. (In Persian) 
Automotive Industry Policy Council of the Industrial Development and Renovation Organization of Iran (1392). Iranian industrial policy document on the horizon of 1404. Tehran: Reports of the Ministry of SAMT
Bergek, A., et. al. (2005, May). Analyzing the Dynamics and Functions of Sectoral. Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference 2005, Paper to be presented at the DRUID Summer Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark.
Boroumand, Mujtaba and Ranjbari, Maryam (1388). Strategic measures of human resource management and innovation performance with emphasis on the role of knowledge management. Police Human Development Monthly, No.24. (In Persian) 
Breschi, S., and Malerba, F. (1997). Sectoral Innovation Systems. In Edquist, C. (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter Publishers.
Ismail Shah Tahmasebi et al. (1398), Investigating the moderating role of managers' social relations and implicit customer needs: https://nmrj.ui.ac.ir/article_24644.html
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 209-226.
Gopalakrishnan, S., & Bierly, (2001). Paralyzing innovation adoption using a knowledge-based approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management.
Green, Josephine, (2005). "Foresight's Contribution Towards Co-Designed Future", Keynote presentation, The 7th Annual Conference on Foresight Management in Corporations and Public Organizations, Helsinki.
Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of evolutionary economics.
Khamseh, Abbas, Jalali, Fatemeh, (2030. Measuring Levels of Innovation Capability in Steel Industry, International Conference on Management, Challenges and Solutions. (In Persian) 
Kim, L. and Nelson, R, (2008). Technology, Learning & Innovation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kim, Linsu, (1999). "Building technological capability for industrialization: analytical frameworks and Korea's experience. “Industrial and corporate change .
Krishnan, H.A., (2001). “Supplier Selection Practice among Small Firms in the United States: Pharmaceutical Industries (1981-1997).
Kuratko, D. F. (2010). Corporate entrepreneurship: An introduction and research review. In Z. J. Aces & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction . New York: Springer Publishers.
Laursen, Keld and Salter, Ammon, (2004). Open for Innovation, The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance Among UK Manufacturing firms; DRUID/Copenhagen Business School.
Lee, K., and Malerba, F. (2017). Catch-up Cycles and Changes in Industrial Leadership: Windows of Opportunity and Responses of Firms and Countries in the Evolution of Sectoral Systems. Research Policy.
Majles Research Center, Deputy of Infrastructure Research and Production Affairs (2016). A comparative study of the automotive industry in different countries of the world. (In Persian) 
Majles Research Center, Deputy of Infrastructure Research and Production Affairs (2016). World Automotive Industry Outlook (2016) Mackenzie Global Institute Report on "Automotive Industry Horizon (2030)”. (In Persian) 
Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production. Research Policy.
Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malerba, F., and Mani, S. (2009). Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production in Developing Countries. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.
Malerba, F., and Nelson, R. (2011). Learning and Catching up in Different Sectoral Systems: Evidence from Six Industries. Industrial and Corporate Change.
Mazloumi Aboukheili A, Aliahmadi A, esmaeilian G. Analysis of innovation indicators and the development of the automotive industry to reduce the innovation gap (Case study: Iran Khodro Industrial Group). Modiriat-e- farda. 1400;66(20):61-78
McAdam Rodney et al, (2007) "Implementing innovation management Manufacturing SMEs :a longitudinal study", Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 385-403.
Ministry of MIM, Office of Energy, Industry and Mining Studies (1396). World Automotive Industry Outlook in accordance with 2030 (Lessons for the Iranian Automotive Industry) Deputy Minister of Infrastructure Research and Production Affairs. (In Persian) 
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge university press.
Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343-373.
Porter, M. E. & C. Van Der Linde (1995), "Green & Competitive: Ending the Stalemate", Harvard Business Review, September–October, PP. 120–134.
Safdari Ranjbar, M., Ghazi Nouri, S. (1398) The role of policies, science, technology and innovation in the development of sectoral systems. (In Persian) 
Salehian, F., and Razmi, J., and July, F. (1398). Designing a hybrid approach based on fuzzy network analysis process and dimtel to evaluate the performance of provinces in the field of road transport in Iran. Transportation Engineering, 10 (3 (40 in a row)), 513-530.
Shahabadi, Abolfazl. Ahmadi Roshan, Zahra (2010). Investigating the Determinants of Innovation (Case Study of Countries) D8 Second National Conference on Creativity, TRIZ and Engineering and Innovation Management in Iran. (In Persian) 
Tehran Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture (2015). Automotive and parts industry in Iran "during the years to 93”. (In Persian) 
Wells, P., & Nieuwenhuis, P. (2012). Transition failure: Understanding continuity in the automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(9), 1681-1692.
Wongling piyarat, J., (2004) "The Use of Strategies in Managing Technological Innovation". European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3): 250-229.