نگاشت مفهومی رفتار کارآفرینانه کارکنان در سازمان های دولتی (رویکرد علم سنجی)

نوع مقاله : مدیریت کارآفرینی( مدیریت کسب­‌وکار، فرایندهای کسب­‌وکار، سیاست‌های کارآفرینانه، کارآفرینی سازمانی، اکوسیستم کارآفرینی، فضای کسب­‌وکار، مدل‌های کسب­‌وکار، چرخه حیات کسب و کارها، . . . )

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه کارآفرینی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه کسب و کار جدید، دانشکده کارآفرینی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه کسب‌وکار، دانشکده کارآفرینی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

توجه به کارآفرینی در سازمان ها در سال های اخیر اهمیت فزاینده ای داشته است. غالب محققان این حوزه به دنبال چرایی و چگونگی توسعه رفتارهای کارآفرینانه کارکنان بوده و اذعان دارند این مقوله عامل مؤثری در سودآوری سازمان‌‌هاست. با این حال، پژوهش‌‌ها در این زمینه، به خصوص در بستر نهادی ایران، پراکنده و محدود است. این تحقیق که با روش  علم سنجی و با استفاده از روش تحلیل استنادی، تکنیک ارزیابانه و تحلیل محتوایی مستندات انجام شده است، برآن است تا مطالعات در این زمینه را مورد بررسی قرار داده و با نظم دهی به تحقیقات به ارائه چارچوب مفهومی و یکپارچه با استفاده از تحلیل محتوایی مستندات بپردازد. جامعه آماری  این تحقیق شامل کلیه مستندات مرتبط ارائه شده در پایگاه داده‌‌ای اسکوپوس به تعداد 1726 سند تا سال 2019 میلادی می باشد. که با استفاده از نرم افزار bibexcle و VOSviewer ارزیابی و مصور سازی انجام شده است. بر اساس خوشه بندی ها و تحلیل محتوایی مستندات، تحقیقات در زمینه «رفتار کارآفرینانه کارکنان» به سه بخش تقسیم بندی شده است. ابعاد مرتبط با عوامل فردی شامل «عوامل اکتسابی و ذاتی» است و ابعاد مربوط به عوامل سازمانی شامل «پویایی، فرهنگ، حمایت، یادگیری» و ابعاد مربوط به پیامدها شامل «توسعه کارآفرینی سازمانی، بهبود عملکرد» بوده است. نهایتاً بر اساس خلاء تحقیقاتی شناسایی شده، پیشنهادات جهت تحقیقات آتی در زمینه سبک رهبری، یادگیری و یادگیری خارجی، آموزش و توانمند سازی و حوزه های نوظهور مرتبط با رفتار کارآفرینانه کارکنان در سازمان های دولتی  ارائه شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Conceptual Mapping of Employees’ Entrepreneurial Behavior in Government Organizations Using a Scientometric Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamidreza Abbasi 1
  • Gholam Hossein Hosseininia 2
  • Ali Davari 3
1 Ph.D Candidate, Department of entrepreneurship, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
2 Associate Professor; New Business Group , Faculty of Entrepreneurship , University of Tehran , Tehran , Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Concept mapping of employee entrepreneurial behavior in government organizations (Scientometric approach). Attention to entrepreneurship in organization has become increasingly important in recent years. Most researchers have been looking for why and how employee entrepreneurial behavior develops and they acknowledge this is an effective factor in the profitability of organizations. However, researches in this scope, especially in the institutional context of Iran are scattered and limited. This research that has been done with the scientometrics method and as well evaluation techniques and content analysis of documents, intends to examine studies in this area and by arranging research, provide a conceptual and integrated model by using content analysis of documents. Statistical population of this research is all related documentation provided in Scopus database which includes 1726 documents until 2019 and evaluation and illustration have been done with by using bibexcel and VOSviewer. Based on the classification of all documents, Research on "Employee Entrepreneurial Behavior" is divided into the three sections. Dimensions related to individual factors include "Acquisitive and Inherent", dimensions related to organizational factors include "Dynamics, Culture, Supporting, Learning" and dimensions of the consequences include "Organizational entrepreneurship development, improved performance". Finally, based on identified research gaps, suggestions for future research are provided.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Organizational entrepreneurship
  • Entrepreneurial behavior
  • Consequences of entrepreneurial behavior
  • Scientometric
Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2001).
Intrapreneurship: Construct
refinement and cross-cultural
validation. Journal of Business
Venturing, 16(5), 495–527.
Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2018).
The role of policy entrepreneurs in
open government data policy
innovation diffusion: An analysis of
Australian Federal and State
Governments. Government
Information Quarterly, 35(1), 123-
134.
Athayde, R. (2009). Measuring enterprise
potential in young people.
Entrepreneurship Theory and
Practice, 33, 481-500.
Bart, C. (2006). Product strategy and
formal structure in
entrepreneurship. Strategic
Management Journal, 7(4), 293-312.
Neneh, B. N. (2019). From entrepreneurial
alertness to entrepreneurial
behavior: The role of trait
competitiveness and proactive
personality. Personality and
Individual Differences, 138, 273-
279.
Borins, S. (2000). Loose cannons and rule
breakers, or enterprising leaders?
Some evidence about innovative
public managers. Public
Administration Review, 60, 498-
507.
Covin, J. G., Garrett Jr, R. P., Kuratko, D.
F., & Shepherd, D. A. (2020). Short
leash or long leash? Parenting
style, initial strategic clarity, and
the development of venture
learning proficiency. Journal of
Business Venturing, 35(4), 105951.
Cirillo, B. (2019). External learning
strategies and technological
search output: Spinout strategy
and corporate invention quality.
Organization Science, 30(2), 361-
382.
Maditati, D. R., Munim, Z. H., Schramm, H.
J., & Kummer, S. (2018). A review of
green supply chain management:
From bibliometric analysis to a
conceptual framework and future
research directions. Resources,
Conservation and Recycling, 139,
150-162.
Gawke, J. C., Gorgievski, M. J., & Bakker, A.
B. (2017). Employee
intrapreneurship and work
engagement: A latent change
score approach. Journal of
Vocational Behavior, 100, 88-100.
Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, causation,
and bricolage: A behavioral
comparison of emerging theories
in entrepreneurship research.
Entrepreneursh. Theory Pract,
36(5), 1019e1051.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-
6520.2012.00537.x
Fuller, B., Liu, Y., Bajaba, S., Marler, L. E., &
Pratt, J. (2018). Examining how the
personality, self-efficacy, and
anticipatory cognitions of
potential entrepreneurs shape
their entrepreneurial intentions.
Personality and Individual
Differences, 125, 120–125
Futterer, F., Schmidt, J., & Heidenreich, S.
(2018). Effectuation or causation as
the key to corporate venture
success? Investigating effects of
entrepreneurial behaviors on
business model innovation and
venture performance. Long Range
Planning, 51(1), 64-81.
Jones C. D., Jolly P. M., Lubojacky C. J.,
Martin G. P., & Gomez-Mejia L. R.
(2019). Behavioral agency and
corporate entrepreneurship: CEO
equity incentives & competitive
behavior. International
Entrepreneurship and
Management Journal, 15, 1017–
1039.
Heinonen, J., & Korvela, K. (2005). How
about measuring
entrepreneurship? Research
report, small business institute,
Turku, Finland, 126.
Hough, J., & Scheepers, R. (2008).
Creating corporate
entrepreneurship through
strategic leadership. Journal of
Global Strategic Management, 3(1),
17- 25.
Husted, K., & Vintergaard, C. (2004).
Stimulating innovation through
corporate venture bases. Journal
of World Business, 39(3), 296-306.
Heavey, C., Simsek, Z., Roche, F., & Kelly,
A. (2009). Decision
comprehensiveness and corporate
entrepreneurship: The
moderating role of managerial
uncertainty preferences and
environmental dynamism. Journal
of Management Studies, 46(8),
1289-1314.
Hisrich, R. D., & Peters, M. P. (2002).
Entrepreneurship. Mc. Graw Hill,
New York.
Iakovleva, T., Kolvereid, L. & Stephan, U.
(2011). Entrepreneurial intentions
in developing and developed
countries. Education + Training,
53(5), 353-370.
Kautonen, T., Gelderen, M., & Fink, M.
(2015). Robustness of the theory of
planned behavior in predicting
entrepreneurial intentions and
actions. Entrepreneurship: Theory
and Practice, 39(3), 655–674.
Kamalian, A. R., Yaghoubi, N. M., &
Elyaskordi, A. (2011).
Entrepreneurship Development in
the organization and its role in
Entrepreurship strategy.
European journal of humanities
and social sciences, 1(1), 50-65.
Kautonen, T., Gelderen, M., & Fink, M.
(2015). Robustness of the theory of
planned behavior in predicting
entrepreneurial intentions and
actions. Entrepreneurship: Theory
and Practice, 39(3), 655–674.
Jong, J., & Hartog, D. (2007). How leaders
influence employees innovative
behaviour. European journal
innovation management, 10(1), 41-
64.
Jalilvand, M. R., & Nasrolahi Vosta, L.
(2015). Examining the relationship
between managerial power and
affective organizational
commitment: An empirical study in
the sport sector of Iran. Sport,
Business and Management: An
International Journal, 5(4), 344-
364.
Ito, K. (2016). Management Control
System to Promote Innovation and
Corporate Venturing.
Management Of Innovation
Strategy In Japanese Companies,
13, 37.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Neacsu, I., & Martin,
G. (2019). CEO risk-taking and
socioemotional wealth: The
behavioral agency model, family
control, and CEO option wealth.
Journal of Management, 45(4), 1713-
1738.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996).
Clarifying the entrepreneurial
orientation construct and linking
it to performance. Academy of
management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
Zolotoy, L., O’Sullivan, D., Martin, G. P., &
Veeraraghavan, M. (2019). The role
of affect in shaping the behavioral
consequences of CEO option
incentives. Journal of
Management, 45(7), 2920-2951.
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., &
Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility
through digital options:
Reconceptualizing the role of
information technology in
contemporary firms. MIS
quarterly, 237-263.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The
promise of entrepreneurship as a
field of research. Academy of
Management Review, 26(1), 217-
226.
Obschonka, M., Hakkarainen, K., Lonka,
K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2017).
Entrepreneurship as a twentyfirst century skill: Entrepreneurial
alertness and intention in the
transition to adulthood. Small
Business Economics, 48(3), 487–
501.
Matviuk, S.G. (2010). A study of Peruvian
entrepreneurs leadership
expectations. Journal of American
Academy of Business, 16(1), 65-70.
McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006).
Entrepreneurial action and the
role of uncertainty in the theory of
the entrepreneur. Academy of
Management Review, 31(1), 132–152
Mazouz, A., Alnaji, L., Jeljeli, R., & AlShdaifat, F. (2019). Innovation and
entrepreneurship framework
within the Middle East and North
Africa region. African Journal of
Science, Technology, Innovation
and Development, 11(6), 699-710.
Moghaddas, S. Z., Tajafari, M., &
Nowkarizi, M. (2020).
Organizational empowerment: A
vital step toward
intrapreneurship. Journal of
Librarianship and Information
Science, 52(2), 529-540.
Morris, M. H., Schindehutte, M., &
LaForge, R. W. (2002).
Entrepreneurial marketing: a
construct for integrating
emerging entrepreneurship and
marketing perspectives. Journal of
marketing theory and practice,
10(4), 1-19.
Miller, D. (2011). Miller (1983) revisited: A
reflection on EO research and
some suggestions for the future.
Entrepreneurship theory and
practice, 35(5), 873-894.
Krueger Jr, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud,
A. L. (2000). Competing models of
entrepreneurial intentions.
Journal of business venturing, 15(5-
6), 411-432.
Olakitan, O. O., & Ayobami, A. P. (2011). An
investigation of personality on
entrepreneurial success. Journal
of Emerging Trends in Economics
and Management Sciences, 2(2),
95-103.
Omotosho, S. I., & Anyigba, H. (2019).
Conceptualising corporate
entrepreneurial strategy: a
contingency and agency
collaborative approach. Journal of
Strategy and Management.
Rouniasi, M. R., Mihani, G., Heydari, A., &
Rezaii, P. (2013). The relationship
between organizational learning
capability and corporate
entrepreneurship development
(case study: telecommunication
company of Hamedan). Advances
in Environmental Biology, 2486-
2494.
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., &
Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility
through digital options:
Reconceptualizing the role of
information technology in
contemporary firms. MIS
quarterly, 237-263.
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and
effectuation: Toward a theoretical
shift from economic inevitability
to entrepreneurial contingency.
Academy of management Review,
26(2), 243-263.
Adomako, S., Opoku, R. A., & Frimpong, K.
(2018). Entrepreneurs'
improvisational behavior and new
venture performance: Firm-level
and institutional contingencies.
Journal of Business Research, 83,
10-18.
Shu, C., De Clercq, D., Zhou, Y., & Liu, C.
(2019). Government institutional
support, entrepreneurial
orientation, strategic renewal, and
firm performance in transitional
China. International Journal of
Entrepreneurial Behavior &
Research.
Tang, J. (2008). Aexploring the
antecedents of entrepreneurial
alertness: Interactions between
individual and environmental
characteristics. In USA: USASBE
Conference Proceedings.
Tenzer, H., & Yang, P. (2020). The impact
of organisational support and
individual achievement
orientation on creative deviance.
International Journal of Innovation
Management, 24(02), 2050020.
Thompson, J. (2005). Proactive
Personality and Job Performance:
A Social Capital Perspective.
Journal of Applied Psychology,
90(5), 10-11.
Van Dam, K., Schipper, M., & Runhaar, P.
(2010). Developing a competencybased framework for teachers’
entrepreneurial behavior.
Teaching and Teacher Education,
26(4), 71-965.
Zampetakis, L. A., Kafetsios, K., Bouranta,
N., Dewett, T., & Moustakis, V. S.
(2009). On the relationship
between emotional intelligence
and entrepreneurial attitudes and
intentions. International Journal of
Entrepreneurial Behavior &
Research.
Zahra, S. A. (1991). Predictors and financial
outcomes of corporate
entrepreneurship: An exploratory
study. Journal of business
venturing, 6(4), 259-285.
Zahra, S. A. (1993). Environment,
corporate entrepreneurship and
financial performance: a
taxonomic approach. Journal of
Business Venturing, 8(4), 319-340.
Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995).
Contextual influences on the
corporate entrepreneurship
performance relationship: A
longitudinal analysis. Journal of
Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-
9026(94)00004-E
Zahra, S. A. (1995). Corporate
entrepreneurship and financial
performance: The case of
management leveraged buyouts.
Journal of Business Venturing,
10(3), 225–247.
Zahra, S. A. (1996). Goverance, ownership,
and corporate entrepreneurship:
The moderating impact of
industry technological
opportunities. Academy of
Management Journal, 39(6), 1713–
1735
Yang, Y. (2012). Bilateral interorganizational learning in
corporate venture capital activity:
Governance characteristics,
knowledge transfer, and
performance. Management
Research Review.
Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from
start to finish. Guilford
publications.
Wong, C., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effect
of leader and follower emotional
intelligence on performance and
attitude: An exploratory study. The
Leadership Quarterly, 23, 243–274.
Walker, R. (2007). It’s where you are that
matters: The networking
behaviour of English local
government officers. Public
Administration, 85(3), 739-756
Wolff, H., & Moser, K. (2006).
Development and validation of a
networking scale. DiagnosticGottingen, 54(2), 161-180.