طراحی مدل یکپارچه به منظور ارزیابی و انتخاب تأمین‌کنندگان ناب و چابک صنعت خودرو با رویکرد ترکیبی دلفی فازی، سوارا و آراس

نوع مقاله : مدیریت تولید و عملیات (برنامه‌­ریزی تولید، چابکی، پایداری، ناب، سبز، برون­‌سپاری، زنجیره تأمین، زنجیره ارزش، کیفیت، بهره وری، صنعت چهار و ابعاد آن، . . .)

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت و حسابداری، واحد رشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رشت، ایران.

2 استادیار مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، واحد رشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رشت، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، واحد رشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رشت، ایران

چکیده

هدف: هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی و ارزیابی تأمین‌کنندگان بر مبنای معیارهای سنتی، نابی و چابکی  و رتبه‌بندی آن‌ها با رویکرد ترکیبی دلفی فازی، سورا و آراس در شرکت سایپا می‌باشد. روش مطالعه: روش پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر جمع‌آوری داده‌ها توصیفی- پیمایشی است. بدین منظور با مرور گسترده ادبیات، ابتدا زیرمعیارهای کلیدی عملکردی (سنتی، ناب و چابک) شناسایی شدند. سپس با بکارگیری تکنیک دلفی فازی، اثربخشی این معیارها در شرکت سایپا مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. جامعه آماری مورد بررسی در این بخش از پژوهش شامل30 نفر از خبرگان و مدیران شرکت مذکور هستند که به دلیل محدودبودن اندازه جامعه، تمامی اعضاء جامعه به عنوان نمونه درنظرگرفته شدند. خروجی دلفی فازی نشان داد که از 20 زیرمعیار شناسایی‌شده پس از ارزیابی خبرگان، در نهایت 17 معیار موردتایید قرار گرفتند. در ادامه با استفاده از تکنیک تصمیم‌گیری نوین سوارا و بکارگیری عقاید 30 نفر از خبرگان، معیارها و زیرمعیارها موردارزیابی قرار گرفته و وزن (اهمیت) آن‌ها استخراج شدند. یافته‌ها: در بین معیارهای سنتی، زیرمعیار "هزینه‌ها" با بیشترین وزن از نظر اهمیت در رتبه اول و زیرمعیار "ظرفیت عملیاتی" در رتبه آخر؛ در بین معیارهای نابی، زیرمعیار "حذف اتلاف‌ها"  به عنوان مهم‌ترین زیرمعیار و زیرمعیار "تأمین مواد مطابق نیاز صنعت" در رتبه آخر؛ در بین معیارهای چابکی، زیرمعیار "انعطاف‌پذیری" در جایگاه اول و زیرمعیار "ارتباطات قوی تأمین‌کننده" در جایگاه آخر استخراج شده است. در ارزیابی نهایی معیارهای اصلی پژوهش نیز، معیار "چابکی" در رتبه اول، معیار "نابی" در رتبه دوم و معیار "سنتی" در رتبه آخر قرار گرفت. در ادامه با عنایت به حساسیت رتبه‌بندی تأمین‌کنندگان ناب و چابک در شرکت موردمطالعه، با استفاده از تکنیک تصمیم‌گیری آراس و بر مبنای وزن استخراجی معیارها، شش تأمین‌کننده شرکت توسط خبرگان موردارزیابی قرار گرفتند و رتبه‌بندی نهایی تأمین‌کنندگان از نظر عملکرد تعیین گردید.نتیجه‌گیری: بدین ترتیب رویکرد پیشنهادی این پژوهش، چارچوب مفهومی ارزشمندی به مدیران شرکت به منظور بهبود وضعیت تأمین‌کنندگان ارائه می‌دهد. همچنین توسعه و بهبود معیارهای سنتی و گزینش تأمین‌کنندگان شرکت بر مبنای معیارهای نابی و چابکی از اهداف اصلی این پژوهش محسوب می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing an integrated model to evaluate and select lean and agile suppliers of the automotive industry with a combined approach of fuzzy Delphi, SWARA and ARAS

نویسندگان [English]

  • nima saberifard 1
  • Mahdi Homayounfar 2
  • Mahdi Fadaei 2
  • Mohammad Taleghani 3
1 PhD Student, Department of Management and Accounting, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor in Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
3 4- Associate professor, Department of Industrial Management, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Objective: The main purpose of this study is to identify and evaluate suppliers based on traditional, lean and agility criteria and rank them with the combined approach of fuzzy Delphi, SWARA and ARAS in Saipa Company. Method: The research method is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of data collection. For this purpose, by reviewing the literature extensively, key functional sub-criteria (traditional, lean and agile) were first identified. Then, using fuzzy Delphi technique, the effectiveness of these criteria in Saipa Company was evaluated. The statistical population studied in this part of the study includes 30 experts and managers of the company, who due to the limited size of the community, all members of the community were considered as a sample. Fuzzy Delphi output showed that out of 20 sub-criteria identified after evaluation by experts, 17 criteria were finally approved. Then, using the new SWARA decision-making technique and applying the opinions of 30 experts, the criteria and sub-criteria were evaluated and their weight (importance) was extracted. Results: Among the traditional criteria, the sub-criterion"costs"with the highest weight in terms of importance in the first place and the sub-criterion"operational capacity"in the last rank;Among the lean criteria, the sub-criterion of"elimination of waste"as the most important sub-criterion and the sub-criterion of "supply of materials according to the needs of the industry" in the last rank; Among the criteria of agility, the sub-criterion of"flexibility" in the first place and the sub-criterion of "strong supplier communication"in the last place are extracted.In the final evaluation of the main criteria of the research, the criterion of "agility" was in the first place, the criterion of "lean"was in the second place and the criterion of "traditional" was in the last place. Then, considering the sensitivity of the ranking of lean and agile suppliers in the company under study, using ARAS decision-making technique and based on the weight of the criteria, six suppliers of the company were evaluated by experts and the final ranking of suppliers was determined in terms of performance. Conclusion: The proposed approach of this research provides a valuable conceptual framework to company managers to improve the status of suppliers. Also, the development and improvement of traditional criteria and the selection of company suppliers based on lean criteria and agility are the main objectives of this research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Traditional
  • Lean
  • Agility
  • Lean and Agile Suppliers
  • Fuzzy Delphi
  • SWARA
  • ARAS

مراجع

Ajalli, M., Saberifard, N., Zinati, B. (2021). Evaluation and Ranking the Resilient Suppliers with the Combination of Decision Making Techniques, Management and Production Engineering Review, Volume 12, Number 3, September, pp. 129–140, DOI: 10.24425/mper.2021.137685.
Ajalli, M., Zinati, B., Saberifard, N. (2022). Ranking of Lean Suppliers with Additive Ratio Assessment Technique (Case Study: Automotive). Logistics Thought, doi:  
10.22034/lot.2022.1266439.1171. (Online). [in Persian].
Antony, J., Sreedharan, R., Chakraborty, A., Gunasekaran, A. (2019). A systematic review of lean in healthcare: a global prospective. Int J Qual Reliab Manag, International Journal of Quality &Reliability Management,
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-12-2018-0346.
Asgarnejad Nouri, B., Saebunia S., Fooladi, E.(2020). The effect of lean and agile supply chain strategies on supply chain accountability and company performance with the mediating role of procrastination and strategic participation of suppliers (Case study: Automotive industry), Industrial Management Perspective, Year 10, No. 39, pp. 89-65. [in Persian].
Blanchard, D.(2021). Supply chain management best practices(p.3), Canada: Published by John Wiley & Sons.
Bouzon, M., Govindan, K., Rodriguez, C. M. T., & Campos, L. M. S.(2016). Identification and analysis of reverse logistics barriers using fuzzy Delphi method and AHP. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 108, 182–197.
Carvalho, H., Govindan, K., Azevedo, S.G., Cruz-Machado, V.(2017). Modelling green and lean supply chains: an eco-efficiency perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 120, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.025.
Ciccullo, F., Pero, M., Caridi, M., Gosling, J., Purvis, L.(2018). Integrating the environmental and social sustainability pillars into the lean and agile supply chain management paradigms: a literature review and future research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 2336–2350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.176.
Darvazeh, S.S., Mooseloo, F.M., Vandchali, H.R. et al.(2022) An integrated multi-criteria decision-making approach to optimize the number of leagile-sustainable suppliers in supply chains. Environ Sci Pollut Res .
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20214-0.
Damien J. Power Amrik S. Sohal Shams.,Ur. R. (2001)."Critical success factors in agile supply chain management - An empirical study", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,Vol. 31 Iss 4 pp. 247 – 265, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600030110394923.
Dastyar, H., Mohammadi, A., & Ali Mohamadlou, M. (2018). Designing a Model for Supply Chain Agility (SCA) Indexes Using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM). In International Conference on Dynamics in Logistics (pp. 58-66). Springer, Cham. [in Persian].
Dubey, R., Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Blome, C., Papadopoulos, T., & Childe, S. J.(2018).Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment: empirical evidence from the Indian auto components industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,38(1), 129-148.
Ebrahimi, H., Ebrahimpour Azbari, M., Moradi, M.(2020). Modeling the evaluation of the impact of lean-agile activities on company performance using scenario analysis based on Bayesian belief network, Industrial Technology Development Quarterly, No. 41, p. 27 -42. [in Persian].
Eko Saputro,T., Figueira,G., Almada-Lobo., B.(2022), A comprehensive framework and literature review of supplier selection under different purchasing strategies, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Volume 167.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108010.
Fadaki, M., Rahman, Sh., Chan, C.(2019), “Leagile supply chain: design drivers and business performance implications”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 58, Issue 18, pp. 5601-5623.
Hashemzahi, P., Azadnia, A., Galankashi, M. R., Helmi, S. A., & Rafiei, F. M. (2020). Green supplier selection and order allocation: a nonlinear stochastic model. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 11(2), 111-138.https://doi. org/10.1108/IJLSS-06-2019-0069.
Hassani, Y., Ceauşu, I., Iordache, A. (2020). Lean and Agile model implementation for managing the supply chain. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence. 14. 847-858. 10.2478/picbe-2020-0081.
Homayounfar, M., Amirteimoori, A. (2019). Balanced evaluation of suppliers performance by applying a hybrid DEMATEL-DEA approach in presence of undesirable factors. Journal of New Researches in Mathematics, 5(18), 31-48. [in Persian].
Homayounfar, M., Goudarzvand chegini, M., Daneshvar, A.(2018). Prioritization of Green Supply Chain Suppliers Using a hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach. jorY 15 (2) :41-61. URL: http://jamlu.liau.ac.ir/article-1-1544-fa.html. [in Persian].
Jakhar, S. K., Rathore, H., & Mangla, S. K. (2018). Is lean synergistic with sustainable supply chain? An empirical investigation from emerging economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 139 (August), 262–269.
Kaviani, M. A., Karbassi Yazdi, A., Ocampo, L., Kusi-Sarpong, S.(2019). An integrated grey-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for supplier evaluation and selection in the oil and gas industry, Kybernetes, https://doi.org/10.1108/K-05-2018-0265, Permanent link to this document: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-05-2018-0265.
Kawa, A., Maryniak, A.(2019). Lean and agile supply chains of e-commerce: empirical research. J. Inform. Telecommun. 3 (2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751839.2018.1553915.
Khoshalhan, F., Sayari, H., Kalantari, T. (2020). A Model of fuzzy cognitive maps of the lean - agile Maritime supply chain. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 19(1), 80-95. doi: 10.22113/jmst.2017.72353.1951. [in Persian].
Kumar Yadav, D & Kumar Yadav, P.(2019). A Review of Green Supply Chain Management International Journal of Scientific Research & Engineering Trends Volume 5,Issue 2, Mar-Apr-2019, ISSN (Online): 2395-566X.
Li, Y., Diabat, A., & Lu, C. C. (2020). Leagile supplier selection in Chinese textile industries: a DEMATEL approach. Annals of Operations Research, 287(1), 303-322.
Mathiyazhagan, K., Agarwal,  V., Appolloni, A., Saikouk, T., Gnanavelbabu, A(2021), Integrating lean and agile practices for achieving global sustainability goals in Indian manufacturing industries, Technological Forecasting & Social Change 171 (2021) 120982, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120982.
Mohamadi, D., Zolfani, S., Prentkovskis, O. (2019). L A R G supplier selection based on integrating house of quality Taguchi loss function and M O P A. Ekonomska Istraživanja / Economic Research. 32. 1944-1964. 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1635036.
Mohammed, A., Harris, I., Soroka, A., Mohamed, N and Ramjaun, T. (2018). Evaluating Green and Resilient Supplier Performance: AHP-Fuzzy Topsis Decision-Making Approach, ICORES 2018 - 7th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems.
Mohammed, A., Wang, Q., Li, X. (2017). Developing a meat supply chain network design using a multiobjective possibilistic programming approach. British Food Journal, 119, 3, 690-706.
Nawanir, G., Lim, KT., Lee, KL., Moshood, TD., Ahmad, ANA . (2020). Less for more: the structural effects of lean manufacturing practices on sustainability of manufacturing SMES in Malaysia. Int J  Supply Chain Manag 2(2):961–975.
Rahimi, A. and Alemtabriz, A. (2022), "Providing a model of LeAgile hybrid paradigm practices and its impact on supply chain performance", International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.               https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-04-2021-0073.
Rahiminezhad Galankashi, M., Bastani, Z., Hisjam, M.(2021). Supplier Selection: A Lean-Agile (Leagile)Approach, Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Singapore, March 7-11, 2021.
Sayuti,NM.(2011). Critical determinants of agile supply chain in buyer and supplier relationship: A literature review and future direction, International Journal Of Business And Management StudiesVol 3, No 1.
Sharma, V., D. Raut,R., Kumar Mangla,S., E. Narkhede, B., Luthra, S., Gokhale, R. (2020). A systematic literature review to integrate lean, agile, resilient, green and sustainable paradigms in the supply chain management, Business Strategy and the Environment;30:1191–1212.
Sharma, V., D.Raut, R., Kumar Mangla.S., E. Narkhede,B., Luthra, S.,Gokhale,R. (2021). A systematic literature review to integrate lean, agile, resilient, green and sustainable paradigms in the supply chain management. Bus Strateg Environ 30(2):1191–1212.                 https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2679.
Sun,W.(2021). E-commerce Supplier Evaluation Model Based on Particle Swarm Optimization Neural Network and Its Application, IEEE International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computer Applications (AEECA).
Swink, M., A. Melnyk, S., L. Hartley, J.(2020). Managing Operations Across the Supply Chain, Published by McGraw-Hill Education, 2 Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121. Copyright © 2020 by McGraw-Hill Education.
Tavana,M., Shaabani,A., Di Caprio,D., Bonyani,A.(2021). An integrated group fuzzy best-worst method and combined compromise solution with Bonferroni functions for supplier selection in reverse supply chains. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, Volume 2,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2021.100009.
Thanki, S., & Thakkar, J. (2018). A quantitative framework for lean and green assessment of supply chain performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(2), 366–400.
Virmani, N., Saha, R., Sahai, R. (2017). Evaluating key performance indicators of leagile manufacturing using fuzzy TISM approach, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management volume 9, pages 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0687-4.
Wang, Y. M., Chin, K.S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1195–1207.
Yücenur,G.N., Şenol,K(2021), Sequential SWARA and fuzzy VIKOR methods in elimination of waste and creation of lean construction processes, Journal of Building Engineering, Volume 44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103196.
 
پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی
دوره 15، شماره 29
شهریور 1402
صفحه 201-229

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 21 آذر 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 08 خرداد 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 22 شهریور 1401

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار